The whole procedure, not half
Every answer pairs the section with the governing rule, threshold and forum, so a resolution clears the right gate the first time.
For Company Secretaries
Secretarial work is unforgiving: the section, the rule and the deadline all have to be right, or the resolution is void and the exposure lands on the board. AskSolique gives you the governing position - section, rule and MCA/SEBI circular - cited, in one place.
AskSolique is built for the compliance calendar a Company Secretary runs: board and shareholder process, ROC filings, LODR disclosures and the constant question of whether this action needs which approval, by when.
The work on your desk
A CS carries the governance of the whole company. The work is procedural, high-frequency, and personally consequential - a missed step is not a rounding error, it is a defect on the record.
Which approval, which forum, what quorum, what disclosure of interest - every resolution has to clear the right procedural gate under the Companies Act and its rules.
LODR material events, trading-window management, filings to the exchanges - each on a strict clock where a day's slip is itself the violation.
The rolling calendar of filings, registers and returns, each tied to a section and a rule that keeps getting amended.
The old way
The Act sets the principle; the rule sets the threshold and procedure. Reading one without the other gives you a compliance answer that is quietly wrong.
The LODR or Companies Rules you rely on may be two amendments behind. A stale checklist means advising the board on rules that have already changed.
Ask a chatbot whether an RPT needs shareholder approval and it gives a confident yes/no that misses the carve-outs - and cites a section that reads right but isn't.
Many defaults attach to officers in default. A procedural miss is not just the company's problem; it follows the CS and the directors.
What standing still costs
In secretarial work, standing still means running governance on positions read from the bare section, without the rule and circular that actually govern them. A resolution passed with the wrong approval can be set aside; a missed Regulation 30 disclosure draws a SEBI penalty and a public governance question; persistent ROC lapses invite MCA scrutiny and director disqualification. These are not quiet risks - they surface in front of the board, the regulator and the shareholders, with the CS's name on the process. Every cycle run the old way is another cycle of that exposure carried on trust.
The AskSolique way
The reference desk for governance - the section, the rule and the deadline, together, whenever a board action needs clearing.
Every answer pairs the section with the governing rule, threshold and forum, so a resolution clears the right gate the first time.
Positions reflect the latest amendment and MCA/SEBI circular, so your checklist never advises on a rule that has moved.
Each conclusion traces to the exact section and rule - the defensible basis you can record and stand behind.
A real question
AskSolique answers
RPTs beyond the thresholds in Rule 15 require prior approval by ordinary resolution under Sec 188, unless the transaction is in the ordinary course of business and at arm's length - in which case board-level compliance may suffice.
The right approval, forum and quorum surface with every action, so resolutions aren't passed defectively.
Disclosure and filing timelines come with the position, so a Regulation 30 or ROC deadline doesn't slip.
Officer-in-default exposure is visible before the action, not after the notice.
Every position is cited to section and rule - the basis you can put in the minutes and before the MCA.
Why now
Governance is getting more scrutinised, not less - disclosure regimes tighten, timelines shorten, and regulators expect the process to be right the first time. The Company Secretaries who stay ahead are the ones who have turned a shelf of amended rulebooks into a single, current, cited reference they can query in seconds. Working from static checklists in a world of moving rules is how good professionals get caught out by an amendment they never saw. The tooling to close that gap now exists; not using it is a choice with the CS's name on it.
Yes - Corporate Law under the Companies Act 2013 and its rules, and SEBI regulations including LODR, SAST and PIT, each cited to the governing text.
Yes. The corpus is maintained as the Act, rules and SEBI regulations are amended, so positions reflect the latest version.
Every answer is tied to the exact section, rule and circular, so you can verify and cite it in the minute book or board note.
Yes - start a free trial and put a real governance question to it; reach us by email or WhatsApp if you need help.
Built by people who have lived this work
AskSolique is built by a tax & regulatory strategist and a distributed-systems technologist - because a defensible answer needs both deep regulatory judgment and serious engineering underneath.
Meet the foundersStart free, bring a real question from your own work, and see the answer come back cited to source. No card, no demo call.