Reason across statutes at once
Follow one fact pattern across tax, FEMA, SEBI and company law in a single thread, without losing what connects them.
For Law Firms
Legal work lives on authority: the right provision, the controlling judgement, and an argument that holds. AskSolique reasons across statute and case law and drafts from it, with every point traceable to source.
AskSolique is built for the way a law firm works a matter: research that spans several statutes at once, case-law reasoning that has to find the controlling authority, and drafting where every assertion needs a citation behind it.
The work on your desk
A law firm's matters rarely sit inside one statute. The work is argument-building - assembling authority, testing it, and turning it into a document that persuades and defends.
A client needs a defensible view on a cross-cutting question. You assemble the statute, the rules and the controlling case law into a single reasoned position.
Finding the Tribunal, High Court or Supreme Court authority that governs - and whether it still holds after later decisions - is the slow, decisive part of the work.
Notices, replies, submissions and agreements where every assertion has to be grounded, and the citations have to survive the other side's scrutiny.
The old way
The controlling position spans statute, rules and a chain of judgements. Assembling it by hand across sources is where the hours go - and where a superseded case slips through.
A general chatbot invents case names and paragraph numbers that read exactly like real authority. In legal work, a fabricated citation is a professional catastrophe.
A single deal touches tax, FEMA, SEBI and company law. Researching each in a different silo loses the thread that connects them.
The reasoning done in research has to be rebuilt again at the drafting stage, because the citations never travelled with it.
What standing still costs
For a law firm, the currency is authority and time, and the old method drains both. Hours that should be argument are spent assembling and re-verifying sources; a missed or overruled authority can lose the matter and expose the firm; and a fabricated citation from an unchecked AI can end in a sanction and a headline. Meanwhile clients increasingly expect the speed that AI-assisted firms deliver - and the firm that still researches the slow way competes on price for the work the faster firm wins on turnaround. Standing still means spending your best people's time on assembly, not advocacy.
The AskSolique way
The workspace a matter runs through - reasoning across every relevant law, then drafting from it with the authority attached.
Follow one fact pattern across tax, FEMA, SEBI and company law in a single thread, without losing what connects them.
Every position is tied to the provision and the controlling judgement, so you check the authority rather than trusting a hallucination.
Turn the reasoned position into the submission or opinion with the citations flowing straight through to the draft.
A real question
AskSolique answers
A service PE or fixed-place PE can arise depending on the duration of presence and the specific treaty's PE article - the days and nature of the activity must be tested against the applicable DTAA, as thresholds differ treaty to treaty.
The assembly and verification is handled, so your people spend their hours building the argument.
Every authority is real and traceable - no fabricated cases reaching a filing.
Cross-domain deals stay in one reasoned thread instead of fragmenting across silos.
Submissions and opinions carry their citations, ready to survive the other side's scrutiny.
Why now
Legal practice is being reshaped by AI faster than most partnerships expected, and the dividing line is trust: firms that adopted tools which hallucinate got burned, and firms that stayed manual are being out-paced. The ground that actually wins is cited, verifiable research - the ability to move at AI speed without ever putting an invented authority in front of a court. Clients are already asking why a matter took a week when a faster firm turns it in a day. The firms that answer that question well are the ones that adopted a defensible workflow early.
Every position is tied to a real, traceable source - the exact provision or judgement - so you verify the authority rather than trusting generated text.
Yes - a single fact pattern can be reasoned across tax, FEMA, SEBI, Customs and company law in one thread, with citations intact.
Yes - the reasoned position carries its citations through to the draft, so the research isn't rebuilt at the drafting stage.
Yes - matters stay within your firm's workspace under enterprise-grade controls.
Built by people who have lived this work
AskSolique is built by a tax & regulatory strategist and a distributed-systems technologist - because a defensible answer needs both deep regulatory judgment and serious engineering underneath.
Meet the foundersStart free, bring a real question from your own work, and see the answer come back cited to source. No card, no demo call.